"al-Iḥsān," published by the institution to which he frequently refers in his commentary on "Mawārid al-Ẓamʾān," claiming that they are his own verification, and the ḥadīth (6489) from "al-Ḍaʿīfah," is in these examples and others similar to what was previously mentioned. It suffices to say that al-Walīd narrated with ʿanʿanah between the two Shaykhs without explicitly stating transmission, and if this indicates anything—as is said today—it indicates modernity! 12- The end of ḥadīth (332) Then I saw the ḥadīth in "Musnad Abī Yaʿlá," printed with commentary and verification by brother (Ḥusayn Salīm) al-Dārānī al-Dimashqī, and I found that he made a gross error, necessitating a warning so that those without knowledge are not deceived, as he attributed it (7/467) to Mālik, the two Shaykhs, Abū Dāwūd, and Aḥmad! There is no basis for the ḥadīth with them, and the origin of this is the focus on verification without understanding the fiqh of the verified ḥadīth or paying attention to it. This is because the ḥadīth in "Abī Yaʿlá" has a continuation at its beginning with the wording: "If the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) saw from women what we see, he would have prevented them from the mosques; just as the Children of Israel prevented their women. I have seen us praying..." the ḥadīth. This first part of the ḥadīth is what his mentioned verification focuses on, whereas its other part, which I attributed only to Abī Yaʿlá, was not narrated by any of them at all in the places he referred to! Rather, they and the rest of the six narrated it in a shortened form similar to it with the wording: "... what they know of the darkness," without mentioning "faces of some." It is verified in "Ṣaḥīḥ Abī Dāwūd" (number 450) and "al-Irwāʾ" (1/278). I said: He fell into two opposing errors; he attributed to them what they do not have, and did not attribute to them what they do have!! So this is how verification should be! I wonder, how would his verification be?!