and Abū Bakr ibn Salmān al-Faqīh in "al-Muntaqá min Ḥadīthihi" (f. 96/1), and Abū al-Qāsim al-Samarqandī in a section of "al-Fawāʾid al-Muntaqāt" (f. 112/1), and Ibn ʿAdī (112/2), and al-Bayhaqī in "al-Shuʿab" (2/438/1) through various chains from Ḥammād ibn Salamah from him. I said: This isnād is ḥasan, and there is a disagreement regarding Abū Ghālib, but his ḥadīth does not fall below the rank of ḥasan, and this ḥadīth of his is ṣaḥīḥ with its preceding and following corroborations. 3 - The ḥadīth of Ṭāriq ibn Shihāb (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu): He is a Companion who saw the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) but did not hear from him, as Abū Dāwūd said. It was recorded by al-Nasāʾī (2/187), Aḥmad (4/315), al-Bayhaqī, and al-Ḍiyāʾ al-Maqdisī in "al-Aḥādīth al-Mukhtārah" (f. 21/2). I said: Its isnād is "ṣaḥīḥ" and the mursal ḥadīths of the Companions are authoritative. (Note) It was mentioned by al-Suyūṭī in "al-Jāmiʿ al-Ṣaghīr" from the narration of Ibn Mājah from Abū Saʿīd. And Aḥmad, Ibn Mājah, and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr" and al-Bayhaqī in "al-Shuʿab" from Abū Umāmah. And Aḥmad, al-Nasāʾī, and al-Bayhaqī also from Ṭāriq. Al-Munāwī said in his "Sharḥ": "The implication of the author's work is that this is the complete ḥadīth, but it is not so. Rather, its completion is found with its compiler Ibn Mājah like Abū Dāwūd: or an unjust ruler." I say: This addition is not found with Ibn Mājah at all. Moreover, it is not part of the core ḥadīth, but rather a doubt from some of Abū Dāwūd's narrators, as evidenced by its absence in the narrations from Abū Saʿīd and others we mentioned. Therefore, there is no benefit in correcting al-Suyūṭī. Yes, it is found with al-Khaṭīb in "al-Tārīkh" (7/239) through the chain of ʿAṭiyyah from Abū Saʿīd. It is weak and rejected due to ʿAṭiyyah's solitary narration of it. 4 - The ḥadīth of Jābir: It was recorded by al-ʿUqaylī in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ" (321) through the chain of ʿAmmār ibn