as will be mentioned in the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿAbbās. The second: from ʿAmr ibn al-Ḥuṣayn, narrated to us by Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAlāthah, from ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Jazarī, from Saʿīd ibn al-Musayyib, from him. It was narrated by Ibn Mājah (no. 445) and al-Dāraquṭnī (p. 38), who said: "ʿAmr ibn al-Ḥuṣayn and Ibn ʿAlāthah are weak." I say: the first is weaker. The third: from al-Bukhtarī ibn ʿUbayd, from his father, from him. It was narrated by al-Dāraquṭnī, who said: "al-Bukhtarī ibn ʿUbayd is weak and his father is unknown." The fourth: from ʿAlī ibn ʿĀṣim, from Ibn Jurayj, from Sulaymān ibn Mūsá, from Abū Hurayrah. It was extracted by al-Dāraquṭnī (37) and from him by Ibn al-Jawzī in "al-Taḥqīq" (1/29/1), and al-Dāraquṭnī said: "ʿAlī ibn ʿĀṣim erred in saying: from Abū Hurayrah from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam). And the one before it is more authentic from Ibn Jurayj." I say: meaning from Sulaymān ibn Mūsá as mursal, and it will be mentioned on p. 51. Ibn al-Jawzī responded with the essence: that the addition of a trustworthy narrator is accepted. Meaning that ʿAlī ibn ʿĀṣim added Abū Hurayrah to the isnād, so it is an accepted addition. But this does not apply here, for Ibn ʿĀṣim is truthful but errs and insists. 3 - As for Ibn ʿUmar, he also has routes from him: The first: al-Mukhliṣ said in "al-Fawāʾid al-Muntaqāh" in "the second of the sixth of them" (q