190/1): Yaḥyá (meaning Ibn Ṣāʿid) narrated to us, saying: al-Jarrāḥ ibn Mukhlid narrated to us, saying: Yaḥyá ibn al-ʿAryān al-Harawī narrated to us, saying: Ḥātim ibn Ismāʿīl narrated from Usāmah ibn Zayd from Nāfiʿ from him. And with this chain, it was narrated by al-Dāraqutnī (36) and from him by Ibn al-Jawzī, and it was narrated by al-Khaṭīb in "al-Mawḍiḥ" (1/111) from Ibn Ṣāʿid, and in "al-Tārīkh" (14/161) through two other chains from al-Jarrāḥ ibn Mukhlid with it. This is a good chain in my view, for all its narrators are reliable and well-known, except for this al-Harawī, whom al-Khaṭīb mentioned without any criticism or endorsement, only describing him as a ḥadīth narrator. As for al-Dāraqutnī, he criticized it by saying: "Thus it was said, but it is an error, and the correct [version] is from Usāmah ibn Zayd, from Hilāl ibn Usāmah al-Fihrī, from Ibn ʿUmar as a mawqūf [report]." Ibn al-Jawzī refuted it by saying: "We say: the one who raises it mentions an addition, and the addition from a reliable narrator is accepted, and the Companion may narrate something as raised, or he may say it by way of a fatwá." I said: This statement is correct if all the narrators of the chain are reliable, and I have noted what is in it, considering that Usāmah ibn Zayd has slight weakness, and there is a difference of opinion regarding him, as Ḥātim ibn Ismāʿīl narrated it from him as raised, as you have seen. Wakīʿ disagreed with him and said it from him as mawqūf on Ibn ʿUmar. Al-Khaṭīb extracted it in "al-Mawḍiḥ" and said: "And this is the correct [version]." ʿUbayd Allāh followed him in raising it from Nāfiʿ. Al-Dāraqutnī and Tamām extracted it in "al-Fawāʾid" (104/1) from the route of Muḥammad ibn Abī al-Sarī, who narrated to us from ʿAbd al-Razzāq from ʿUbayd Allāh with it. Al-Dāraqutnī said: "Raising it is an error."