he said, and it will be mentioned from Imām Aḥmad that Ibn Marzūq used to narrate it and then stopped. ʿAmr ibn Marzūq is reliable but has errors, as mentioned in "Taqrīb," so perhaps he reconsidered or something of doubt occurred to him, so he stopped narrating it, and Allāh knows best. The second: from ʿAlī ibn al-Aqmar from Abū Juḥayfah with it. It was recorded by al-Ḥākim (4/121) from Fahd ibn ʿAwf, who narrated to us Faḍl ibn Abī al-Faḍl al-Azdī, who informed me ʿUmar ibn Mūsá: ʿAlī ibn al-Aqmar informed me... and he said: "Authentic isnād." Al-Dhahabī refuted it by saying: "I said: Fahd, al-Madīnī said, is a liar, and ʿUmar is ruined." Al-Mundhirī also critiqued it, saying in "al-Targhīb" (3/122): "Rather, it is very weak, it includes Fahd ibn ʿAwf and ʿUmar ibn Mūsá." I said: And this ʿUmar is Ibn Mūsá al-Wajīhī, and he is also accused, and it was narrated through another route. Ibn Qudāmah said in "al-Muntakhab" (10/194/1): "Mahná said: I asked Aḥmad and Yaḥyá, I said: ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn Yaḥyá narrated to me, Shurayk narrated to us from ʿAlī ibn al-Arqam... and he mentioned it? They said: It is not authentic. I said to Aḥmad: Is it narrated from another route? He said: ʿAmr ibn Marzūq used to narrate it from Mālik ibn Mughūl from ʿAlī ibn al-Arqam from Abū Juḥayfah and then he left it after. Then I asked him later? He said: It is not authentic." I said: And ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn Yaḥyá is al-Madanī, accused of lying by Ibrāhīm ibn al-Mundhir al-Ḥizāmī. Al-Bukhārī said: