it as well. And this isnād is ḥasan or close to ḥasan: ʿAlī ibn Aḥmad al-Razzāz, whom al-Dhahabī described as truthful and who has a biography in al-Khaṭīb's work (11/330-331), said: "We wrote from him, and he was a prolific listener with many teachers, and he leaned towards truthfulness. He died in the year 419." And ʿAbd al-Ṣamad al-Ṭastī was also given a biography by al-Khaṭīb (11/41), who said: "He was trustworthy. I heard al-Barqānī mention him and praise him, urging us to write his ḥadīth." Aḥmad ibn Bishr ibn Saʿd al-Marthadī, according to al-Khaṭīb (4/54), was praised by Ibn Kharrāsh, and ʿAlī ibn al-Munādī said: "He was one of the trustworthy. He died in the year 286." Saʿd ibn Zanbūr was also mentioned by al-Khaṭīb, who quoted Ibn Maʿīn saying: "He is trustworthy; I do not think he lies. He died in the year 230." The rest of the men in the isnād are known from the "Tahdhīb" and are narrators of the Ṣaḥīḥ, except that Ismāʿīl ibn Mujālid, despite being one of al-Bukhārī's narrators, is criticized regarding his memory. In "Taqrīb," it is stated: "He is truthful but makes mistakes." I said: someone like him does not have his ḥadīth fall below the rank of ḥasan, especially since he was not alone in narrating it, but others narrated it..