(5/320), and al-Ṭabarī in "Tafsīr" (11/73) from the route of Qutaybah and Ḥajjāj from al-Layth from Khālid ibn Yazīd from Saʿīd ibn Abī Hilāl that Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh said: the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) came out to us one day and said: ... and he mentioned it. al-Tirmidhī said: "This ḥadīth has been narrated from different routes from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) with a chain more authentic than this; this is a mursal ḥadīth; Saʿīd ibn Abī Hilāl did not meet Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh." al-Bukhārī suspended it (7281/ M) following the ḥadīth of Saʿīd ibn Mināʾ from Jābir—mentioned later. al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar said in "al-Nukat al-Ẓirāf" (2/184) commenting on al-Tirmidhī's words: "al-Ḥākim has also narrated it in 'al-Mustadrak' from the route of Abū Ṣāliḥ—the scribe of al-Layth—from al-Layth; he added between Saʿīd ibn Abī Hilāl and Jābir: (ʿAṭāʾ)." I say: it is in it (4/393), and he authenticated it, and al-Dhahabī agreed with him! The narration of al-Tirmidhī—without mentioning ʿAṭāʾ—is more authentic; for several reasons: the first: that this Abū Ṣāliḥ—whose name is ʿAbd Allāh ibn Ṣāliḥ—was truthful but made many mistakes, was firm in his writing, and was negligent; as al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Taqrīb." The second: that two trustworthy narrators—Qutaybah and Ḥajjāj—as mentioned earlier narrated from al-Layth without it! The third: that Abū Ṣāliḥ was inconsistent in it; he narrated it this way—once—and made it—another time—from the route of Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn from Jābir!