it was narrated by al-Ḥākim in "al-Mustadrak" (1/46), and Abū Yaʿlá in "al-Musnad al-Kabīr"—as in "Musnad al-Fārūq" (1/260) by Ibn Kathīr, and "Majmaʿ al-Zawāʾid" (3/94-95) by al-Haythamī—through the chain of ʿAbd Allāh ibn Bishr from al-Aʿmash from Abū Sufyān from Jābir from ʿUmar in a marfūʿ form. Al-Ḥākim authenticated it according to the criteria of al-Shaykhayn. Al-Haythamī said: "Its narrators are trustworthy." It was also narrated by Aḥmad (3/4 and 17), al-Ḥākim (1/46), al-Bazzār (925 - Zawāʾid), and Ibn Ḥibbān (3414 - al-Iḥsān) through the chain of Abū Bakr ibn ʿAyyāsh from al-Aʿmash from Abū Ṣāliḥ from Abū Saʿīd al-Khudrī from ʿUmar in a marfūʿ form. It was narrated by Abū Yaʿlá (1327), and al-Bazzār (924) through the chain of Jarīr from al-Aʿmash from ʿAṭiyyah from Abū Saʿīd who said: ... and he mentioned the ḥadīth similarly, with the story. And in it after: ʿUmar said ... Al-Ḥākim said regarding the ḥadīth of ʿAbd Allāh Bishr: "This ḥadīth is not a defect for the ḥadīth of al-Aʿmash from Abū Ṣāliḥ; for it supports it with another isnād." I say: and the established path—Allāh knows best—is the narration of Muslim; because it is from the narration of a group—who are trustworthy and reliable—from al-Aʿmash with his mentioned isnād. It is possible that the narration of ʿAbd Allāh ibn Bishr is another path—as al-Ḥākim indicated—since al-Aʿmash is a meticulous and extensive narrator