"narrated from ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿAbbās, and it was said: from ʿAbbās ibn ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿAbbās, and this is the correct view." al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar adopted this in his "Tahdhīb"; he mentioned him among his teachers. If this is the case, it means: there was an omission by the copyist or some narrators, so it is: ʿAbbās ibn ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿAbbās. He has another ḥadīth narrated from al-Faḍl ibn ʿAbbās; they criticized it for being disconnected, and it is included in "Ḍaʿīf Abī Dāwūd" under number (114). As for Ibn al-Qaṭṭān's criticism of him by saying: "his condition is unknown," and similarly al-Ḥāfiẓ's statement about him: "acceptable"; it is refuted and corrected by the narration of four trustworthy narrators from him, and Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt" (5/258). Similarly, Mūsá - who is Ibn Jabr al-Anṣārī -; Ibn al-Qaṭṭān also said about him: "his condition is unknown," and al-Ḥāfiẓ said: "obscure"! Although a large group of trustworthy narrators narrated from him, Ibn Ḥibbān said in his "Thiqāt": "trustworthy but errs"! This does not harm him, as he is moderate; especially since his counterpart Kulthūm ibn Jabr was included by Muslim and authenticated by a group, so the isnād is good; as mentioned by al-Mundhirī and al-Haythamī, if Saʿīd ibn Kathīr al-Madanī is al-Malāʾī. Whatever the case may be; it is strengthened by the following chain, which is: the second: narrated by Muḥammad ibn Faḍl who said: Sālim ibn Abī Ḥafṣah and Abū Manṣūr al-Juhanī narrated from Zayd ibn Wahb from Abū Dharr ... he mentioned it similarly and its wording: he said: The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said: