and it is supported by the general statement of the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) in the ḥadīth of Thābit ibn al-Ḍaḥḥāk with the wording: "Whoever kills himself with something will be punished with it on the Day of Resurrection." It was narrated by the two Shaykhs [al-Bukhārī and Muslim] and others in a narration, so al-Bukhārī [recorded it in] (6047, 6105, and 6652), Muslim (1/73), Abū ʿAwānah (1/45), and al-Tirmidhī (2636); and he said: "Allāh will punish him with what he killed himself with..." And he said: "A ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ ḥadīth." The two Shaykhs and others have other wordings of it, some of which I have included in "al-Irwāʾ" (8/201/2575). (Two clarifications): One of them: It seems that the error made by al-Mundhirī in attributing the ḥadīth to al-Bukhārī was also made by others, such as al-Haythamī, for example; as he did not include it in "Majmaʿ al-Zawāʾid," nor in "Mawārid al-Ẓamʾān ilā Zawāʾid Ibn Ḥibbān," and this is only because he thought it was in "al-Bukhārī" as al-Mundhirī said! Therefore, it is not according to the criteria of "al-Zawāʾid"! So the addition was hidden from him, just as it was hidden from Shaykh al-Nājī who noticed al-Mundhirī's mistake, but he did not notice the confirmation of the addition in "al-Musnad," otherwise; he would have attributed it to it and not remained silent. For this reason, this ḥadīth was among the ḥadīths I included in my book "Ṣaḥīḥ Mawārid al-Ẓamʾān"; may Allāh facilitate its printing and distribution. Similarly, what the commentator on "al-Iḥsān" (13/328 - al-Muʾassasah) did; he attributed it to al-Bukhārī without clarifying that the addition is not with him, and he repeated the error in his commentary on "Mushkil al-Āthār" (1/183/195 - al-Muʾassasah), and he did not clarify the difference between his narration