first: The ḥāfiẓ Ibn Kathīr; despite his extensive familiarity with the ḥadīths of "al-Musnad" and frequently attributing to it, to the extent that it was said he was among the most knowledgeable about it, he missed the ḥadīth of the chapter. He did not mention it in his commentary on Sūrah (al-Naṣr) (4/562), but only mentioned the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿAbbās from two sources narrated by Ibn Jarīr and al-Ṭabarānī, and the mursal ḥadīth of ʿIkrimah, missing the narration of al-Bukhārī from Ibn ʿAbbās! second: The ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar; despite his well-known thoroughness in tracing the words of ḥadīth in "al-Fatḥ" and extracting them, distinguishing between the authentic and the weak in most cases, such that we know of no equal to him in this regard, he missed the ḥadīth of the chapter and its details, except for the ḥadīth of Hilāl ibn Khabbāb, and only from the narration of al-Bazzār, even though he explained the statement of the Prophet ﷺ: "The people of Yemen have come to you..." in more than one place in "al-Fatḥ," and he mentioned it in "Aṭrāf al-Musnad" (8/36/10223) from the narration of ʿAbd al-Razzāq, but without the verse of al-Naṣr! third: The ḥāfiẓ al-Suyūṭī; despite mentioning the ḥadīth of the chapter in "al-Durr al-Manthūr" (6/408), and also the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿAbbās, he went far afield in their extraction, attributing the first only to Ibn Mardawayh! And the latter only to Ibn ʿAsākir! And he remained silent about their isnād, as was his usual practice. fourth and finally: The statement of the corrector of "Tārīkh al-Bukhārī" and its annotator with beneficial scholarly comments, the esteemed Shaykh ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Yaḥyá al-Muʿallimī al-Yamānī; he said in the commentary on his statement in the ḥadīth (when it comes): "Thus in the original, and perhaps what follows: 'when it comes' was omitted from the original, so Allāh knows best what 'when it comes' was intended." I said: It has become clear—and all praise is due to Allāh—from this verification and extraction that he intended (when it comes