all of this arises from imitation and good opinion of the author al-Mundhirī, despite his many errors that al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Nājī found surprising, and he uncovered many of them. However, some things escaped him, which I pointed out in my commentary on "Ṣaḥīḥ al-Targhīb" and "Ḍaʿīf al-Targhīb"; and this is among them. Then al-Nājī, amidst his many errors, fell into another error, saying: "And the wording: 'the usurpation' was not seen by Imām al-Balqīnī in his 'Tadrīb'! He said: 'And it is not in the ḥadīths: "Whoever usurps"...'." Nor did our teacher Ibn Ḥajar, following his teacher Ibn al-Mulaqqin in "Takhrīj Aḥādīth al-Rāfiʿī," where they said: "None of them narrated it with the wording: 'Whoever usurps'...". I said: This negation might be applicable to al-Balqīnī, for although I have not yet reviewed his words in "al-Badr al-Munīr," since the volume containing the book "al-Buyūʿ" has not been printed, I saw it in "Khilāṣat al-Badr al-Munīr." He said (2/98/1620) — after mentioning it from the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah similarly: "And I do not know that it has been reported in a narration: 'Whoever usurps,' although I mentioned it in the (original) from paths that do not contain it." I said: So al-Nājī's correction of him is valid, unlike his teacher Ibn Ḥajar; for he said after extracting the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah with its wording, and other ḥadīths he extracted without mentioning their wording: