and I saw our virtuous brother (Abū Isḥāq al-Ḥuwaynī) discussing this collection in his commentary on "Musnad Saʿd ibn Abī Waqqāṣ," where he said (216) - after presenting what is in "al-ʿIlal": "I said: The narration of Maʿn here agrees with the narration of al-Khaṣīb ibn Nāṣiḥ, and perhaps 'Umm ʿAmr' is the nickname of 'ʿĀʾishah bint Saʿd,' so the two narrations meet, and Allāh knows best." However, he firmly stated the weakness of its isnād as he did for three previous ḥadīths, claiming that (ʿUbaydah bint Nābil) is of unknown status, following the earlier statement of Ibn Ḥajar: "acceptable"! or using it as support; for it is similar in meaning, and the correct view is what was previously explained that she is trustworthy. And what supports this is that al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Fatḥ" (4/100) - regarding another ḥadīth from her route: "Its men are trustworthy." And our virtuous brother quoted it from him (p. 214). This - along with what I have previously explained - instills confidence in the authenticity of her ḥadīth. And Allāh knows best. (Note): This ḥadīth is among those omitted from al-Haythamī's book "Majmaʿ al-Zawāʾid," and therefore Shaykh al-Aʿẓamī, who followed al-Haythamī in his other book "Kashf al-Astār" (3/207/2581), did not comment on it; because he did not find anything to transmit! That is the extent of his knowledge and verification, which the publisher praised in his annotations! This; and ʿĀṣim ibn Abī al-Nujūd narrated from Muṣʿab ibn Saʿd from his father: that the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) was brought a dish and ate from it, leaving some leftovers, and said: "A man from this direction, from the people of Paradise, will come (in another narration: will appear) and eat this."