(Note): Ḥusayn Asad al-Dārānī attributed the ḥadīth in his commentary on "Musnad al-Ḥumaydī" to Muslim in his "Ṣaḥīḥ"! So I say: Yes, but not through this route. The narration of Muslim from the route of Abū Hurayrah has been previously mentioned, and it includes a story about Abū Dharr. As for the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿAbbās: It was narrated by al-Tirmidhī (2/264-265), al-Nasāʾī (1/199), and others; it is included in "al-Taʿlīq al-Raghīb" (2/260), where I explained the weakness of its isnād and that its text contains something objectionable! As for the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿUmar: It was narrated by al-Bazzār (3094) through the route of Mūsá ibn ʿUbaydah from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Dīnār from Ibn ʿUmar... He mentioned it in full, then al-Bazzār said afterward: "Its defect is Mūsá ibn ʿUbaydah." Al-Haythamī also pointed this out in "al-Majmaʿ" (10/101). Then I found two mursal routes for the ḥadīth in "Muṣannaf ʿAbd al-Razzāq" (3181 and 3185) from ʿAṭāʾ and from Qatādah. In conclusion, the ḥadīth is very authentic, and the variation in some of its wording does not affect it in any way. All praise is due to Allāh for His guidance; and I ask Him, glorified be He, for more of His bounty. *