I said: This is an authentic chain of narration, perfectly connected through transmission, and it meets the criteria of al-Bukhārī and Muslim. Both have included it as follows: al-Bukhārī included it (11/362/6514) through the route of al-Ḥumaydī, as did Abū Nuʿaym in "Ḥilyah" (10/4), and al-Baghawī in "Sharḥ al-Sunnah" (14/259/4056) through the route of al-Bukhārī, as well as in his "Tafsīr" (8/518), stating: "Agreed upon its authenticity." It was also included through the route of Aḥmad: by Abū Nuʿaym as well (7/310), who said: "Authentic and established." It was included through the route of Ibn al-Mubārak: by al-Tirmidhī (2380), who said: "A good and authentic ḥadīth." It was included by Muslim (8/211-212), al-Nasāʾī (1/274), Ibn Ḥibbān in his "Ṣaḥīḥ" (5/42/3097), al-Ḥākim (1/74), Abū Nuʿaym also (10/4), and al-Bayhaqī in "al-Zuhd" (268/695). Abū Nuʿaym also said afterward: "Established and authentic." Qatādah followed it up from Anas with a similar elevated narration, more complete than it, and he said regarding family and wealth: "That is his family and his servants." It was narrated by Ibn Ḥibbān, al-Ḥākim, who authenticated it according to the criteria of al-Bukhārī and Muslim, and al-Dhahabī agreed with him. The authenticity of its chain was affirmed by al-Ḥāfiẓ al-ʿIrāqī in "Takhrīj al-Iḥyāʾ" (3/233), and it was previously referenced under number (2481) in the ḥadīth of al-Nuʿmān ibn Bashīr similarly, with al-ʿIrāqī also affirming its chain, and in it, he said regarding family and wealth: "That is his servants and his family."