al-Ṭabarānī recorded it (3/81/1). I said: This is a very weak chain; Layth is weak, and ʿAbbād ibn Kathīr is abandoned. A similar narration from Ibn ʿAbbās is reported with the wording: "... or killed one of his parents, and the image-makers, and a scholar whose knowledge did not benefit him." Abū al-Qāsim al-Hamdānī recorded it in "al-Fawāʾid" (1/196/1) from ʿAbd al-Raḥīm Abū al-Haytham from al-Aʿmash from al-Shaʿbī from Ibn ʿAbbās with it. I said: This is a weak chain; this ʿAbd al-Raḥīm is Ibn Ḥammād al-Thaqafī. Al-ʿUqaylī said in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ" (278): "He narrated from al-Aʿmash strange and baseless ḥadīths." Al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Lisān": "Al-Bayhaqī indicated its weakness in 'al-Shuʿab'." This ḥadīth of Ibn ʿAbbās was mentioned by al-Munāwī in "Fayḍ al-Qadīr" as supporting evidence for the well-known ḥadīth: "The people who will receive the severest punishment on the Day of Resurrection are a scholar whose knowledge did not benefit him." He commented on al-Suyūṭī after clarifying its weakness: "But the ḥadīth has a solid basis, as al-Ḥākim narrated in 'al-Mustadrak' from the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿAbbās as marfūʿ..." I said: He mentioned it, but I have not reviewed its chain with al-Ḥākim now to examine it, and it is most likely from the path of the aforementioned ʿAbd al-Raḥīm. If so, the ḥadīth does not rise above the level of weakness. And Allāh knows best