"Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim" (6/172), and "al-Adab al-Mufrad" by al-Bukhārī (834) through two chains from Ibn Jurayj, with the wording: ".. with (Yaʿlā) and with (Barakah) ... " the ḥadīth. Among the rare statements supporting the saying of the Imam of the Abode of Migration: "No one is immune from having their words accepted or rejected, except the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam)": is Abū Dāwūd's critique of the mention of the name (Barakah) in this ḥadīth, which upon investigation turns against him; for he said after the ḥadīth—having narrated it from his teacher Abū Bakr ibn Abī Shaybah (4960), which is in "al-Muṣannaf" (8/666/5958)—through the route of al-Aʿmash from Abū Sufyān from Jābir similarly, and it includes: (and Barakah), and likewise al-Bukhārī also extracted it in "al-Adab" (833) through another route from al-Aʿmash—Abū Dāwūd said after it, critiquing the mention of (Barakah) in it: "Abū al-Zubayr narrated from Jābir from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) similarly; he did not mention (Barakah)!" Al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Mundhirī followed up on this in "Mukhtaṣar al-Sunan" (7/257); he said after it: "There is a consideration; for Muslim extracted the ḥadīth in his 'Ṣaḥīḥ' from the narration of Ibn Jurayj from Abū al-Zubayr, and it includes: 'The Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) intended to name (the boy) - thus - with (Muqbil) - thus - and with (Barakah) ... ' the ḥadīth." I say: he refers to the ḥadīth of Ibn Jurayj which I previously referenced, and it includes the name (Barakah) which Abū Dāwūd indicated as being absent, which is a mistake on his part—may Allāh have mercy on him, for it is there as you saw, as it is in the route of Abū Sufyān also from Jābir. Supporting this is the ḥadīth of Samurah ibn Jundub, raised with the wording: "Do not name your boy Yasār or Rabāḥ ... " the ḥadīth. It was narrated by Muslim and others, and it is referenced in "al-Irwāʾ" (1177)