he was asked about it, and al-Dāraqutnī said: It is narrated by Muḥammad ibn Abī Nuʿaym and al-Walīd ibn ʿAṭāʾ ibn al-Agharr from Ibrāhīm ibn Saʿd from al-Zuhrī from ʿĀmir ibn Saʿd, while others narrate it from Ibrāhīm ibn Saʿd from al-Zuhrī as mursal, and this is the correct version. I said: And this narration that we have narrated strengthens the connected version. I said: And Zayd ibn Akhzam is a trustworthy ḥāfiẓ, as is his teacher Yazīd ibn Hārūn, so it is a strong corroboration for Ibn Abī Nuʿaym al-Wāsiṭī, attesting to his truthfulness and precision. However, Zayd ibn Akhzam was opposed in his isnād, as Ibn Mājah said (no. 1573): Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn al-Bukhtarī al-Wāsiṭī narrated to us: Yazīd ibn Hārūn narrated to us from Ibrāhīm ibn Saʿd from al-Zuhrī from Sālim from his father, who said: A Bedouin came. The ḥadīth in its entirety. And this appears to be authentic, and therefore it was said in "al-Zawāʾid" (Q 97/2): "Its isnād is authentic, its men are trustworthy, Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl was deemed trustworthy by Ibn Ḥibbān, al-Dāraqutnī, and al-Dhahabī, and the rest of the men of the isnād meet the criteria of the two Shaykhs." I said: But al-Dhahabī said about him: "However, he made a significant mistake." Then he presented a ṣaḥīḥ ḥadīth in which he added "shooting on behalf of women," which is an objectionable addition, and others among the trustworthy did not mention this addition. Al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar agreed with this. I said: So it appears that he also erred in the isnād of this ḥadīth, saying in it... from Sālim from his father, while the correct version is from ʿĀmir ibn Saʿd from his father, as in the narration of Ibn Akhzam and others. Al-Haythamī said in "al-Majmaʿ" (1/117-118) after presenting it from the narration of Saʿd: "It was narrated by al-Bazzār and al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Kabīr,' and its men are the men of the authentic collections." From the fiqh of the ḥadīth: