It was recorded by Abū Nuʿaym in "al-Ḥilyah" (10/218): Sulaymān ibn Aḥmad narrated to us: Aḥmad ibn Zuhayr narrated to us: Muḥammad ibn Manṣūr al-Ṭūsī narrated to us: Hāshim ibn al-Qāsim narrated to us with it. And this isnād is authentic; all its men are trustworthy. Aḥmad ibn Zuhayr is Aḥmad ibn Yaḥyá ibn Zuhayr al-Tustarī, the ḥāfiẓ, the teacher of Sulaymān ibn Aḥmad—who is al-Ṭabarānī, the ḥāfiẓ—and he is among his well-known teachers; for he narrated more than one hundred and fifty ḥadīths from him in "al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ" (2229-2384, according to my numbering) in "al-Siyar" (14/362). Above him are narrators of the two Shaykhs; except for al-Ṭūsī, who is trustworthy. His teacher Hāshim ibn al-Qāsim's kunyah is Abū al-Naḍr. Al-Ṭabarānī also recorded it from him in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (23/377/891) with another isnād, saying: Abū Yaḥyá al-Rāzī narrated to us: Maḥmūd ibn Ghaylān narrated to us: Abū al-Naḍr narrated to us: Sālim ibn Ṭalḥah narrated to us: Jāmiʿ ibn Abī Rāshid narrated to us—while his tears were flowing—from Umm Mubashshir with it. I said: It occurred as "Sālim ibn Ṭalḥah," and I did not find a biography for him, so I fear that "Sālim" is an error by the copyist or printer; and the correct name is "Muḥammad" as in the isnād of "al-Ḥilyah" mentioned earlier. I also fear that "Zubayd" was omitted, as he is mentioned among the teachers of Muḥammad ibn Ṭalḥah, who is al-Yāmī al-Kūfī, and among the narrators from Jāmiʿ ibn Abī Rāshid. The ḥadīth of ʿĀʾishah has another route with a different, abbreviated wording similar to it; it was recorded earlier under numbers (1622 and 2693), and the ḥāfiẓ mentioned them in "al-Fatḥ" (13/60) without comment, indicating thereby the strengthening of the ḥadīth. *