It was recorded by al-Bukhārī and others, and I have referenced it in "Etiquettes of Marriage" (p. 180 - new edition/Al-Maʿārif). (Note): The ḥadīth of Rashīd Abū ʿAbd Allāh was deemed ḥasan by the commentator on "Aḥādīth al-Shiʿr," despite its weakening by Rashīd following Ibn ʿAdī and al-Dhahabī! It seems he deemed it ḥasan due to the narration of Thumāmah from Anas, as he mentioned it after the narration of Ibn Mājah and al-Ṭabarānī. Strangely, he did not comment on it at all, and it is clear that this narration is the correct one as previously mentioned, and that considering the ḥadīth of Rashīd as ḥasan is a clear mistake due to its contradiction with the preceding narrations; it is rejected. This, if it indicates anything, it indicates—as it is said today—his novelty in this knowledge, especially since he did not present the wording of the narration of Ibn Mājah and al-Ṭabarānī for the readers to see that it contradicts the wording of Rashīd's narration; so reflect! *

- (1) (What is this call of ignorance?! Leave it; for it is offensive). It was recorded by al-Bukhārī (4905 and 4907), Muslim (8/19), al-Tirmidhī (3312) - who said: "ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ" -, al-Ṭaḥāwī in "Mushkil al-Āthār" (4/239), Ibn Ḥibbān (7/592/5958 and 8/193/6548), al-Bayhaqī in "Dalāʾil" (4/53-54), ʿAbd al-Razzāq in "al-Muṣannaf" (9/468/18041), Aḥmad (3/392-393), and Abū Yaʿlá (3/356-357 and 458) all from the route of Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah - and ʿAbd al-Razzāq paired him with Maʿmar... - from ʿAmr ibn Dīnār who heard Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh say: We were with the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) in a battle, and a man from the Muhājirīn kicked a man from the Anṣār. The Anṣārī said: O Anṣār! And the Muhājirī said: O Muhājirīn! The Messenger of Allāh said