it appeared as such, and it is also a typographical error; as evidenced by its editor's comment: "In the manuscript: (al-Ṭabarī)." I said: And this is the correct version, which is indicated and confirmed by our investigation. So I do not know why the editor did not establish it as in the original?! Likewise, al-Suyūṭī mentioned it in "al-Durr al-Manthūr" (6/221) from the narration of ʿAbd ibn Ḥumayd from Qatādah, and from his narration from al-Ḥasan—who is al-Baṣrī—he said: "While the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) was delivering the khuṭbah on Friday, a caravan arrived in Madīnah and they dispersed..." the ḥadīth is similar to the ḥadīth of the chapter, without mention of the second and third Friday, and this is correct—if Allāh wills. Then I saw that al-Bayhaqī narrated the ḥadīth in "Shuʿab al-Īmān" (5/235-236) with a weak chain from Muqātil ibn Ḥayyān, as a muʿḍal similar to the ḥadīth of Qatādah with Ibn Jarīr, and Allāh knows best. Abū Dāwūd also narrated it in "al-Marāsīl" (105/62) with a sound chain from Muqātil ibn Ḥayyān who said: "The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) used to pray the Friday prayer before the khuṭbah like the two ʿĪds, until one Friday when the Prophet was delivering the khuṭbah and had prayed the Friday prayer, a man entered and said: 'Dihyah ibn Khalīfah has arrived with his merchandise, and when Dihyah arrived, his people would greet him with tambourines, so the people went out, and Allāh revealed: (And when they saw a transaction or a diversion, they rushed to it) (Sūrah al-Jumuʿah, verse 11), so the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) advanced the khuṭbah on Friday and delayed the prayer..." the ḥadīth. I said: And this is objectionable in this context with its muʿḍal nature