they accused him of fabrication." As for the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah, it is narrated by Abū Bakr ibn ʿAyyāsh who said: from Ibn ʿAṭāʾ from his father from Abū Hurayrah in a marfūʿ form. It was recorded by al-Dāraqutnī, and al-Zaylaʿī criticized it due to this Abū Bakr, saying: "There is disagreement about him." Ibn Rajab criticized it due to Ibn ʿAṭāʾ, saying: "He is Yaʿqūb and he is weak." As for the ḥadīth of Jābir, it is narrated by Ḥayyān ibn Bishr the judge who said: Ḥammād ibn Salamah narrated to us from Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq from Muḥammad ibn Yaḥyá ibn Ḥabbān from his uncle Wāsiʿ ibn Ḥabbān from him. It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Awsaṭ," and al-Zaylaʿī remained silent about it. Ibn Rajab said: "This isnād is close, and it is rare. It was produced by Abū Dāwūd in "al-Marāsīl" from the narration of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Mughrah from Ibn Isḥāq from Muḥammad ibn Yaḥyá ibn Ḥabbān from his uncle Wāsiʿ in a mursal form. And this is more authentic." I say: Its chain revolves around Ibn Isḥāq, who is a mudallis and has used the ambiguous term 'ʿanʿana', and Ḥayyān ibn Bishr, who is in the connected path, about whom Ibn Maʿīn said: There is no harm in him. He has a biography in "Tārīkh Baghdād" (8/285), and it has been narrated from Wāsiʿ ibn Ḥabbān from Abū Lubābah from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam). It was narrated by Abū Dāwūd in "al-Marāsīl," as transmitted by al-Zaylaʿī, who did not provide its isnād for us to examine