I said: This chain of transmission consists of narrators, all of whom are reliable according to the criteria of the authentic collections, except that Samāk's narration from ʿIkrimah specifically is inconsistent, and he changed towards the end of his life, so he was sometimes prompted, as mentioned in "al-Taqrīb." As for the ḥadīth of ʿUbādah ibn al-Ṣāmit, it is narrated by al-Fuḍayl ibn Sulaymān, who narrated to us from Mūsá ibn ʿUqbah from Isḥāq ibn Yaḥyá ibn al-Walīd ibn ʿUbādah ibn al-Ṣāmit from ʿUbādah in a marfūʿ form. It was recorded by Ibn Mājah and ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad in "Zawāʾid al-Musnad" (5/326). I said: This chain is weak and disconnected between ʿUbādah and his grandson Isḥāq. The ḥāfiẓ said: "He reported from ʿUbādah, and his condition is unknown." As for the ḥadīth of ʿĀʾishah, there are two paths from her: the first is narrated by al-Wāqidī: Khārijah ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Sulaymān ibn Zayd ibn Thābit informed us from Abū al-Rijāl from ʿAmrah from her. It was recorded by al-Dāraqutnī (522), and Ibn Rajab said: "Al-Wāqidī is abandoned, and there is disagreement regarding the weakening of his teacher." The second is from Rūḥ ibn Ṣalāḥ, who narrated to us from Saʿīd ibn Abī Ayyūb from Abū Suhayl from al-Qāsim ibn Muḥammad from her, and from Abū Bakr ibn Abī Sabrah from Nāfiʿ ibn Mālik Abū Suhayl from al-Qāsim with it. It was recorded by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ" and he said: "No one narrated it from al-Qāsim except Nāfiʿ ibn Mālik." I said: He is trustworthy and relied upon in "the two Ṣaḥīḥs," but the two paths to him are weak, as Ibn Rajab said. In the first, there is Rūḥ ibn Ṣalāḥ, who is weak, and in the second, Abū Bakr ibn Abī Sabrah, who is even weaker, as mentioned in "al-Taqrīb": "