I said: and this isnād is authentic, its men are trustworthy, the men of the two Shaykhs [al-Bukhārī and Muslim], and the follower that al-Bazzār referred to for al-Aʿmash, I did not recognize him, but Abū Muʿāwiyah was followed up, as it was extracted by Aḥmad (6/307 and 317), Isḥāq ibn Rāhwayh in his "Musnad" (4/215/1), Abū Yaʿlá (12/436/7003), Ibrāhīm ibn Ṭahmān in his "Mashyakha" (189/143), and al-Ṭabarānī also (23/319/724) through routes from al-Aʿmash with it. And the narration of Masrūq, it is narrated by Sharīk from ʿĀṣim from Abū Wāʾil from him, he said: "ʿAbd al-Raḥmān entered upon Umm Salamah, and she said: I heard the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam)... " the ḥadīth, it does not include the story of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān with the wealth. It was extracted by Aḥmad (6/312) and al-Ṭabarānī (23/317-318). I said: and ʿĀṣim - who is Ibn Bahdalah - is good in ḥadīth if he does not contradict, and al-Aʿmash contradicted him, and he is more reliable than him, but he has tadlīs, and he narrated it with ʿanʿanah, and they mentioned this ʿĀṣim among his shaykhs, so if he heard it from him, the ḥadīth is good, otherwise it is authentic as mentioned before. And Sharīk - who is Ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Qāḍī - has poor memory, but he was followed by ʿAmr ibn Abī Qays with al-Ṭabarānī, and he is truthful but has errors as in "Taqrīb". And the ḥadīth was mentioned by al-Haythamī in two places in "al-Majmaʿ" (1/112 and 9/72), he first presented it with the abridged narration - the narration of Sharīk - and said: "It was narrated by Aḥmad, Abū Yaʿlá, and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr", and in another narration by Abū Yaʿlá and Aḥmad from her. (then he mentioned the complete narration - the narration of al-Aʿmash) and in it is ʿĀṣim ibn Bahdalah, and he is trustworthy but errs!" Then he presented it again - I mean in the other place - with the wording of the complete narration, and he said: