in summary: the ḥadīth in question is anomalous from al-Zuhrī from Anas, and what is preserved from him is another ḥadīth, in which the ring is "of silver." Therefore, Muslim did not include it, and it was only recorded by him and al-Bukhārī from the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿUmar. For this reason, the commentator on "al-Iḥsān" (12/305) erred by attributing it to Muslim.

- "If one of you prays and breaks wind, let him hold his nose and then leave." It was recorded by Ibn Mājah (1222) from ʿUmar ibn ʿAlī al-Muqaddamī from Hishām ibn ʿUrwah from his father from ʿĀʾishah from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam), who said: and he mentioned it. And through the route of ʿUmar ibn Qays from Hishām ibn ʿUrwah with it. I say: This isnād is weak from both perspectives, and the men of the first are all trustworthy, except that al-Muqaddamī practices severe tadlīs. Al-Dhahabī said: "A well-known trustworthy person, but he is a man who practices tadlīs. Ibn Saʿd said: A trustworthy person who practices severe tadlīs, saying: 'I heard' and 'he narrated to us' then remains silent, then says: 'Hishām ibn ʿUrwah,' and 'al-Aʿmash.'" Ibn Maʿīn said: There is no harm in him, and Abū Ḥātim said: He is not to be used as evidence. And he said: If it were not for his tadlīs, we would have judged for him if he brought an addition, but we fear he might have taken it from someone untrustworthy." And the men of the other perspective are also trustworthy except for ʿUmar ibn Qays, who is the Makkan known as (Sandal), and he is abandoned as in "al-Taqrīb." I fear that the ḥadīth revolves around him, and that al-Muqaddamī received it from him, then practiced tadlīs. And Allāh knows best. Then I came across two trustworthy followers of his, so the ḥadīth is authentic by that, and all praise is due to Allāh, and I have included them in "Ṣaḥīḥ Abū Dāwūd" (1020).