and ʿAlī ibn ʿĀbis is weak. Israel contradicted him, narrating it from Abū Isḥāq from him, attributed to ʿAlī as a statement of his. This is more authentic. It was recorded by al-Nasāʾī (454/708). Its narrators are trustworthy. In summary, the ḥadīth is authentic from his (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) action and command, and it is recommended as mentioned by the ḥāfiẓ in "al-Fatḥ". This, and the ḥadīth of the chapter has tested some of those involved in this noble science and those trading in it, from the publishers claiming knowledge, and the writers, though I do not say authors in it, all of whom denied al-Bukhārī's narration of his (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) action, some explicitly, and some implicitly. The first: Muḥammad Fuʾād ʿAbd al-Bāqī, for he said under the ḥadīth of al-ʿAlāʾ ibn al-Musayyib in "al-Adab al-Mufrad" (p. 312/1211): "al-Bukhārī in: 4 - Book of Ablution, 75 - Chapter on the Virtue of Sleeping in a State of Ablution. Muslim in: 48 - Book of Remembrance, Supplication, Repentance... ḥadīth 56, 57, and 58." This is incorrect for two reasons: the first: that al-Bukhārī only narrated the ḥadīth in the place he indicated in "Ablution" through the route of Manṣūr, which is from his (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) command, not from his action as previously explained, so it would have been appropriate—if he knew—to attribute it to the Book of "Supplications," as the ḥadīth is there as previously indicated by its number. The second: that Muslim did not narrate the ḥadīth at all from his (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) action, neither through the route of al-ʿAlāʾ ibn al-Musayyib nor through any other, as has become clear to you from this documentation. The second: Shaykh al-Jīlānī in his commentary on "al-Adab al-Mufrad" (2/619), for he