among this group is what Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned in the fourth category of "al-Thiqāt" (8/268): "Saʿīd ibn ʿAnbasah, who narrates from Ibn Idrīs and the Kufans, and Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm al-Būshanjī narrated from him, though he sometimes contradicted." I said: it is possible that he is al-Rāzī, and it is possible that he is someone else, which is apparent from the method of the ḥāfiẓ in "al-Lisān." If he is someone else, then the chain is good. And Allāh knows best. It is strengthened by the fact that there is another path, as Aḥmad said (6/138): Wakiʿ narrated to us from Ismāʿīl from Muṣʿab ibn Isḥāq ibn Ṭalḥah from ʿĀʾishah in a shortened form with the wording: "It is eased for me that I saw the whiteness of ʿĀʾishah's palm in Paradise." This is a good isnād except for the unknown status of this Muṣʿab, as Ibn Abī Ḥātim and Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt" among the (Followers) (5/412) and (Followers of the Followers) (7/478) from the narration of this Ismāʿīl only from him, who is Ismāʿīl ibn Abī Khālid, and likewise, the ḥāfiẓ mentioned him in "al-Taʿjīl." He added in the ḥadīth after attributing it to "al-Musnad": "meaning death," as an explanation from him for his saying: "It is eased for me." It is possible that this is in his copy of "al-Musnad," which is unlikely, because it is not in "Jāmiʿ al-Masānīd" (37/104/3004). And Allāh knows best. The ḥadīth was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim in "al-ʿIlal" (2/375) through the path of al-Muʿallá ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān with his isnād from ʿĀʾishah with the wording of the title, and he said: "Fabricated with this isnād, and al-Muʿallá is abandoned in ḥadīth." His statement: "with this isnād" seems to refer to the aforementioned isnāds, and I see that the ḥadīth is good with the combined isnāds of Abū Ḥanīfah and Aḥmad, and Allāh knows best.