I said: And this isnād is very weak; its flaw is ʿĪsá, this al-Khayyāṭ, who is also called (al-Ḥannāṭ) and (al-Khabbāṭ), the seller of khabaṭ. He practiced all three crafts. Al-Dhahabī said in "al-Kāshif": "They considered him weak." Al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Taqrīb": "Abandoned." And Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan—he is al-Shaybānī, the companion of Abū Ḥanīfah—was mentioned by al-Dhahabī in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ", and he said: "al-Nasāʾī considered him weak due to his memory." But the flaw is from his abandoned shaykh, and Ibn Qutaybah also narrated it from him in "Iṣlāḥ Ghalat Abī ʿUbayd" (manuscript al-Ẓāhiriyyah, folio 52/2). Al-Khaṭṭābī referenced it in "Gharīb al-Ḥadīth" (1/221) and before him Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī in "Tahdhīb al-Āthār" (Musnad ʿAlī, p. 116), and he indicated its weakness by introducing it with the phrase: "It is narrated from the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) that he said." Its verifier, the esteemed scholar Maḥmūd Shākir, said: "I did not find its isnād, and Abū ʿUbayd al-Qāsim ibn Sallām did not provide its isnād in Gharīb al-Ḥadīth 1:79." I said: It seems that its isnād was omitted from the printed edition that the professor referred to, and here I have presented it to the esteemed readers, taken from the manuscript of "Gharīb Abī ʿUbayd" and the manuscript..