then I found a supporting narration for the ḥadīth from ʿUmar, recorded by Ibn Mājah (3255) and al-Bazzār in "Musnad" (1185 - Kashf al-Astār) through the route of Saʿīd ibn Zayd from ʿAmr ibn Dīnār from Sālim from his father from ʿUmar, raised [to the Prophet], with the addition: "And the food of four is sufficient for five and six, and indeed the blessing is in the group." Al-Bazzār said: "We do not know it from ʿUmar except through this route, ʿAmr ibn Dīnār is the sole narrator of it, and he is lenient, and his ḥadīths are not shared by anyone else." I said: This ʿAmr ibn Dīnār is not the same as the previously mentioned ʿAmr ibn Dīnār; that one is from Mecca and is trustworthy, while this one is from Basra, known as (Qahramān Āl al-Zubayr), and he is weak as mentioned in "Taqrīb," which is why al-Bazzār said: "He is lenient." So I do not know after this how al-Mundhirī said in "Targhīb" (2/142): "Al-Bazzār narrated it with a good isnād"! Perhaps he was confused and thought that this ʿAmr ibn Dīnār is the trustworthy Meccan, not the weak Basran. This has occurred in another place in the sunnah, and he clarified the misconception, saying (3/306): "Al-Bazzār narrated it, and its men are the men of (Ṣaḥīḥ)"! The Basran is not among the men of "Ṣaḥīḥ," so he means the Meccan, for he is among the men of the two Shaykhs! Yes, the ḥadīth is strong with its collective routes, so it is at least ḥasan. And Allāh knows best.