(No. 9485 - my numbering) in an abridged form from the route of Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Muqriʾ - ʿAbd Allāh ibn Yazīd -: ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿIyāsh ibn ʿAbbās narrated to us: My father ʿIyāsh ibn ʿAbbās narrated to us, saying: I heard ʿĪsá ibn Hilāl al-Ṣadafī and Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ḥublī saying: We heard ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmr ibn al-ʿĀṣ saying: I heard the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) say: and he mentioned it. al-Ṭabarānī said: "It is not narrated from ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmr except through this isnād." ʿAbd Allāh ibn Wahb corroborated it: ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿIyāsh al-Qutbānī informed me of it in a similar manner, but he did not mention Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ḥublī in his isnād, and he said: "They ride on cushions until they reach the doors of their mosques." It was narrated by al-Ḥākim (4/436) and he said: "Authentic according to the criteria of the two Shaykhs." al-Dhahabī refuted it by saying: "I said: Although ʿAbd Allāh was used as evidence by Muslim, he was weakened by Abū Dāwūd and al-Nasāʾī, and Abū Ḥātim said: He is close to Ibn Lahīʿah." I said: al-Layth ibn Saʿd, the imam, narrated from him, and he is one of his peers, and Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt," so with this and Muslim's use of him as evidence, he is of moderate reliability with good ḥadīth, and Shaykh Aḥmad Shākir exaggerated in this regard and said in his commentary on this ḥadīth from "al-Musnad" (7083): "Its isnād is authentic"! al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Mundhirī indicated in "al-Targhīb" (3/101) to its strengthening by introducing it with the formula (ʿan) and it appeared to him that al-Ḥākim said: "Authentic according to the criteria of Muslim," and this should be the original "al-Mustadrak" and "its summary" because if it were as previously quoted: "according to the criteria of the two Shaykhs," al-Dhahabī would not have said in refuting it what was previously mentioned, and he would have said: "Even though..