I said: however, the narration of Ibn al-Mubārak along with the other ʿAbādilah from Ibn Lahīʿah is considered authentic by scholars as they mentioned in his biography. Therefore, the isnād is authentic in my view because the rest of its narrators are trustworthy and well-known from the narrators of Muslim, and Ḥanash is Ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Sabāʾī, the Ṣanʿānī from Damascus. Part of it is supported by the narration of Muḥammad ibn Sanān al-Qazzāz: ʿAmr ibn Muḥammad ibn Abī Razīn narrated to us: Hishām ibn Ḥassān narrated to us from ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿUmar from Nāfiʿ from Ibn ʿUmar who said: "I saw the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) perform tayammum at a place called Marbad al-Ghanam, and he could see the houses of Madīnah." It was recorded by al-Dāraqutnī (p. 68) and al-Ḥākim (1/180) who said: "A ṣaḥīḥ ḥadīth, uniquely reported by ʿAmr ibn Muḥammad ibn Abī Razīn, who is truthful, and it was also narrated by Yaḥyá ibn Saʿīd al-Anṣārī and others from Nāfiʿ from Ibn ʿUmar." I said: al-Dhahabī agreed with him, but it is refuted for two reasons: first, that this Ibn Abī Razīn has been criticized regarding his memory, as indicated by al-Ḥāfiẓ in "al-Taqrīb" by saying: "Truthful, but he sometimes errs." Therefore, if he contradicts the trustworthy narrators, the mind does not feel at ease authenticating his ḥadīth. The second reason is that this al-Qazzāz is weak, so attributing the error to him is more appropriate than attributing it to his teacher, as is not hidden from those knowledgeable in this science. Then al-Ḥākim recorded it from the route of Yaḥyá ibn Saʿīd from Nāfiʿ who said: