the first: ʿAfīf ibn Sālim. the second: al-Ḥaḍramī. the third: Abū Nuʿaym. I said: And all of these are trustworthy. Then I saw in "al-Lisān": "Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar ibn Abī Ḥafṣ al-ʿAṭṭār al-Anṣārī, narrated by ʿAfīf ibn Sālim and Abū Ghasān, was among those who made mistakes. Ibn Ḥibbān said this in (al-Thiqāt)." So this is a fourth narrator from him, who is Abū Ghasān, and his name is Mālik ibn Ismāʿīl al-Nahdī al-Kūfī. However, his statement: "ibn Abī Ḥafṣ" if it is not a mistake, contains a new benefit, which is that Abū Ḥafṣ is the grandfather of Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar, not the nickname of his father as is clear from the previous statement of Ibn Abī Ḥātim. And Allāh knows best. In summary: this Muḥammad ibn Abī Ḥafṣ al-Anṣārī is known for having these four trustworthy narrators narrate from him, so he is to be used as evidence. Rather, it could be said that he is relied upon at the level of those whose ḥadīth is considered good, if not for Ibn Ḥibbān's statement about him: "he was among those who made mistakes." Thus, in my view, the ḥadīth is ḥasan li-ghayrihi because it has a supporting narration from the ḥadīth of Abū Ayyūb al-Anṣārī, which is more complete than this. It was narrated by Aḥmad and others, and I have referenced it in "Irwāʾ al-Ghalīl" (1975). As I mentioned, for the ḥadīth of the translation, there are other sources where the name al-Anṣārī appears as: "Muḥammad ibn Abī Jaʿfar," which led me to mistakenly think it was different from the one I translated here. That was an error on my part due to some narrators' mistakes, so reliance should be on what I have mentioned here, which, as far as I know, I have not been preceded in. If I am correct, it is from Allāh, and to Him is due all praise and gratitude. If I am mistaken, it is from me, and I ask Allāh to pardon me and forgive my sin.