"it was only narrated by Muḥammad from Raqabah, and only by ʿAfīf from him; Ibn ʿAmmār was unique in narrating it." I said: al-Haythamī criticized it due to Muḥammad ibn Abī Ḥafṣ al-Anṣārī, saying: "I did not find anyone who documented him." The editor of "Majmaʿ al-Baḥrayn" (1/338 - Maktabat al-Rushd) followed him! I said: al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Mizzī mentioned him among the teachers of ʿAfīf ibn Sālim as it appears here, and among those who narrated from Raqabah ibn Miṣqalah: Muḥammad ibn Abī Ḥafṣ al-ʿAṭṭār. Then I referred back to "al-Mīzān," and I found in it: "Muḥammad ibn Abī Ḥafṣ al-Kūfī al-ʿAṭṭār. He narrated from al-Suddī: al-Azdī said: 'They speak against him,' and al-Ḥāfiẓ said in 'al-Lisān': 'al-Nabātī said: He is Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar al-Anṣārī who will be mentioned.'" So I referred back to the indicated place and saw in it: "Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar al-Anṣārī narrated from Kathīr al-Nawāʾ with a rejected report, al-Azdī weakened him. End." And in "al-Thiqāt" by Ibn Ḥibbān: Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar ibn ʿAlī al-Anṣārī narrates from Usāmah ibn Zayd al-Laythī, and al-Ḥaḍramī narrates from him. It is possible that he is the same person." Then I referred back to "al-Jarḥ wa-al-Taʿdīl" by Ibn Abī Ḥātim, and found in it (4/1/19): "Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar, who is Ibn Abī Ḥafṣ al-Anṣārī al-ʿAṭṭār, narrated from al-Suddī, narrated by Abū Nuʿaym." I say: It has become clear that Muḥammad ibn Abī Ḥafṣ al-Anṣārī is Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar al-Anṣārī al-ʿAṭṭār, and he is known for having three trustworthy narrators narrate from him: