except for my teachers al-Bazzār and Ibn Jamīl, for they are trustworthy and mentioned in "Tārīkh Baghdād" (4/76-77). Al-Mundhirī cited the ḥadīth (4/100) in a similar manner and said: "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Kabīr' with isnāds, one of which is authentic, and in 'al-Awsaṭ' similarly." Al-Haythamī added in the reference (10/252): al-Bazzār, and said: "And one of its isnāds in 'al-Kabīr' has men of the authentic [collections]." Then they mentioned it from the ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah in a similar manner and said: "It was narrated by al-Bazzār, and its narrators are the narrators of the authentic [collections]." Then al-Haythamī mentioned it from the ḥadīth of Anas and added at the end: "He says: 'I was indeed the least of the three to him.'" And he said: "It was narrated by al-Bazzār and al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Awsaṭ', and their narrators are the narrators of the authentic [collections], except for ʿImrān al-Qaṭṭān, who has been deemed trustworthy, though there is disagreement about him." I said: Al-Ḥajjāj followed him from Qatādah from Anas with it. It was extracted by al-Ḥākim (1/74), and he said: "Authentic according to their criteria," and al-Dhahabī agreed with him, and it is as they said. This al-Ḥajjāj is Ibn al-Ḥajjāj al-Bāhilī al-Baṣrī al-Aḥwal. And it has a detailed corroborating report from the ḥadīth of ʿĀʾishah, raised [to the Prophet]. It was narrated by Ibn Abī Ḥātim in "al-ʿIlal" (2/118) through the route of ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz from al-Zuhrī from Saʿīd ibn al-Musayyib and ʿUrwah ibn al-Zubayr from her, and he said: "This is a rejected ḥadīth from the ḥadīth of al-Zuhrī, it does not seem to be true, and ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz is weak in ḥadīth, most of his narrations are erroneous, I do not know of any sound ḥadīth from him."