Munabbih from Abū Hurayrah as a marfūʿ ḥadīth. I said: This isnād is authentic according to the criteria of al-Shaykhayn. It was also narrated by Abū al-Ḥasan Aḥmad ibn Yūsuf al-Sulamī in "Ṣaḥīfah Hammām ibn Munabbih" (no. 137): ʿAbd al-Razzāq narrated to us with it. Muḥammad ibn Shabwayh - who is Ibn Isḥāq al-Sijzī - differed from them, saying: ʿAbd al-Razzāq informed us from Maʿmar from al-Zuhrī from Anas with it. He said: Ibn ʿAdī narrated it (374/2), and said: "Ibn Shabwayh is weak, he alters and steals ḥadīths." ʿAbd al-Razzāq was not the only one to narrate it, for Abū Dāwūd said: Muḥammad ibn al-Mutawakkil al-ʿAsqalānī narrated to us, ʿAbd al-Razzāq narrated to us, ḥaddathnā Jaʿfar ibn Musāfir al-Tanīsī narrated to us, Zayd ibn al-Mubārak narrated to us, ʿAbd al-Malik al-Ṣanʿānī narrated to us, both from Maʿmar with it. This second isnād's men are trustworthy, except for ʿAbd al-Malik - who is Ibn Muḥammad al-Ṣanʿānī - as he is weak in ḥadīth. As for Muḥammad ibn al-Mutawakkil al-ʿAsqalānī in the first isnād, he is weak, but his weakness does not harm the ḥadīth because he is followed by al-Sulamī and others whom we have mentioned earlier. If you understand this, then al-Munāwī's statement weakening the ḥadīth after attributing its origin to Abū Dāwūd and Ibn Mājah: "And in it is Muḥammad ibn al-Mutawakkil al-ʿAsqalānī, mentioned by al-Dhahabī in 'al-Ḍuʿafāʾ', and Abū Ḥātim said: weak." I say it contains several errors: the first is that this al-ʿAsqalānī is in the isnād of Ibn Mājah as well, which is not the case, for he said: