Anas (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu) with number (1765), and I presented there the ḥadīth of the chapter in summary, and mentioned a follower of Muslim ibn Nudhār.

"The believer is forgiven." It was narrated by al-Ḥākim (1/58 and 4/251) from Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz (ibn ʿUmar) ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAwf, who said: Ḥusayn ibn ʿUthmān ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān and ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Ḥumayd ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAwf narrated to me from ʿĀmir ibn Saʿd from his father in a marfūʿ manner. He said: "They both agreed on ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Ḥumayd, and this is a strange authentic ḥadīth, but they did not include it due to the unknown status of Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Zuhrī." Thus he said, and al-Dhahabī agreed with him, which is astonishing for two reasons: the first is that if he is unknown, how can his ḥadīth be authenticated? The second is that he is not unknown, but rather he is well-known for severe weakness according to al-Bukhārī and others. Al-Dhahabī himself said in "al-Mīzān": "Al-Bukhārī said: his ḥadīth is rejected. Al-Nasāʾī said: abandoned. Al-Dāraqutnī said: weak." He was followed by Sahl ibn Bakkār who narrated to us from al-Ḥasan ibn ʿUthmān from al-Zuhrī from ʿĀmir ibn Saʿd with it. It was narrated by al-Khaṭṭābī in "Gharīb al-Ḥadīth" (151/1). This al-Ḥasan was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim (1/2/25) from the narration of Saʿīd ibn Yaḥyā ibn al-Ḥasan from him, and he did not mention any criticism or endorsement about him, so he is of unknown status. It does not strengthen it that he was paired with ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Ḥumayd ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAwf - who is al-Zuhrī - as you know it is from the narration of that weak one!