"with a ṣaḥīḥ isnād"! and al-Dhahabī agreed with him! I say: It is not surprising from al-Ḥākim, as his leniency is well-known, but the surprise is in al-Dhahabī following him and overlooking his own statement in "al-Mughnī": "Yazīd ibn Sinān Abū Furwah al-Rahāwī, well-known, was deemed weak by Aḥmad and Ibn al-Madīnī"! Yes, the ḥadīth has a good supporting narration reported by ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAqīl from al-Ṭufayl ibn Abī ibn Kaʿb from his father, in a marfūʿ form. And he added: "The quaking one came, followed by the subsequent one, death came with what it contains." It was recorded by al-Ḥākim (4/308) and Abū Nuʿaym in "al-Ḥilyah" (8/377) in full, and by Aḥmad (5/136) only the addition, as well as al-Tirmidhī (2459) who said: "A ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ ḥadīth." And I say: It is only ḥasan due to the well-known disagreement regarding Ibn ʿAqīl. In summary, with this supporting narration, the ḥadīth is ṣaḥīḥ.

"Whoever Allāh created for one of the two abodes, He prepares him for its deeds, and the confirmation of this is in the Book of Allāh: * (And [by] the soul and He who proportioned it. And inspired it [with discernment of] its wickedness and its righteousness) * (Sūrah 91:7-8)." It was recorded by Aḥmad (4/438): Ṣafwān ibn ʿĪsá narrated to us, ʿAzrah ibn Thābit informed us from Yaḥyá ibn ʿAqīl from Ibn Yaʿmar from Abū al-Aswad al-Duʾalī who said: