thus, it is a ḥasan isnād due to other factors, and it may be considered ḥasan in itself, making it ṣaḥīḥ due to other factors. The other: from Ziyād Abū ʿAmr from al-Ḥasan from him. It was recorded by Aḥmad (4/319). This isnād is good, its narrators are trustworthy, except that al-Ḥasan—who is al-Baṣrī—is a mudallis, and he narrated it with ʿanʿanah. There is slight criticism regarding Ziyād—who is Ibn Abī Aslam. Ismāʿīl ibn Naṣr contradicted him and said: ʿAbbād ibn Rāshid narrated to us from al-Ḥasan from ʿImrān ibn Ḥuṣayn in a marfūʿ form. Thus, he made it from the musnad of ʿImrān. It was recorded by al-Bazzār, who said: "We do not know it to be narrated from the Prophet ﷺ with an isnād better than this, nor do we know it to be narrated from ʿImrān except through this route." Al-Haythamī said (10/68): "It was narrated by al-Bazzār and its isnād is ḥasan (!) and by al-Ṭabarānī in (al-Awsaṭ)." 3 - As for the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿUmar, it is narrated by ʿĪsá ibn Maimūn who said: Bakr ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Muzanī informed us from him with it. It was recorded by Abū Nuʿaym in "al-Ḥilyah" (2/231) from Abū ʿĀṣim, and al-Sahmī in "Tārīkh Jurjān" (386) from Muḥammad ibn Abān, and al-Qaḍāʿī in "Musnad al-Shihāb" (110/1) from Muʿallá ibn Asad, all three from ʿĪsá ibn Maimūn. I say: This isnād is ṣaḥīḥ, for ʿĪsá ibn Maimūn, from whom Abū ʿĀṣim narrated, is al-Jurashī al-Makkī, the exegete, and he is trustworthy. And Bakr ibn ʿAbd Allāh al-Muzanī is a reliable and eminent tābiʿī