I heard Anas ibn Mālik say it as a marfūʿ ḥadīth. This is a three-narrator chain from the few three-narrator chains of Ibn Mājah, but it is weak, as both Jabbārah and his teacher Kathīr are weak, as mentioned in "Taqrīb." However, it has corroboration from the ḥadīth of Ibn Masʿūd. It was recorded by al-Tirmidhī (2/5) through the route of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Isḥāq from al-Qāsim ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd from his father from Ibn Masʿūd as a marfūʿ ḥadīth, and he said: "A good ḥadīth." This is what he said, and perhaps it is due to its corroborations, for ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Isḥāq is Abū Shaybah al-Wāsiṭī, and he is weak. Then I referred to "Kashf al-Astār ʿan Zawāʾid Musnad al-Bazzār" and found the ḥadīth in it (p. 284/1) through the route of ʿAbd Allāh ibn Ṣāliḥ who narrated to us from ʿAṭṭāf from Nāfiʿ from Ibn ʿUmar as a marfūʿ ḥadīth. Thus, the ḥadīth is from Ibn ʿUmar, not Ibn ʿAbbās, so what is in "al-Majmaʿ" is an error. It is a valid corroboration.

"No nation has ever been transformed, leaving behind descendants." al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Awsaṭ" (429): Aḥmad ibn Rushdīn narrated to us, Muḥammad ibn Sufyān al-Ḥaḍramī narrated to us, Muslimah ibn ʿAlī narrated to us from Muḥammad ibn al-Walīd al-Zubaydī from al-Zuhrī from Ḥamzah ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar from his father as a marfūʿ ḥadīth, and he said: "No one narrated it from al-Zuhrī except al-Zubaydī." I say: He is a reliable and firm narrator, but the one who narrates from him, Muslimah ibn ʿAlī, who is al-Khushnī, is abandoned. However, the ḥadīth is authentic, as Layth said: from ʿAlqamah ibn Marthad from al-Maʿrūr ibn Suwayd