from al-Bukhārī quoting "Taysīr al-Wuṣūl," so I do not know if they attributed it from him or from "al-Taysīr"? It should be reviewed. (Benefit): Ibn ʿAbd al-Hādī said after attributing the ḥadīth to some of those we mentioned and added (al-Nasāʾī) that he did not narrate it in his "al-Ṣughrā" but rather in "al-Kubrā - Faḍāʾil al-Qurʾān" as in "Tuhfat al-Ashrāf" by al-Mizzī (6/290): "And al-Khaṭīb said: Every ḥadīth that comes with: 'ʿĀṣim from Zur from ʿAbd Allāh' without specification is Ibn Masʿūd, except for this ḥadīth." And al-Khaṭṭābī said in "Maʿālim al-Sunan" (2/136): "I said: It has been reported in the tradition: that the number of verses of the Qurʾān corresponds to the levels of Paradise, it is said to the reciter: Ascend in the levels according to what you used to recite from the verses of the Qurʾān, so whoever completes the recitation of the entire Qurʾān will attain the highest levels of Paradise, and whoever recites a part of it will ascend in the levels according to that, so the end of the reward is at the end of the recitation." The tradition he referred to was recorded by Ibn Abī Shaybah (10/466/10001): Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Sudūsī narrated to us from Maʿfas ibn ʿImrān from Umm al-Dardāʾ who said: "I entered upon ʿĀʾishah and said: What is the virtue of the one who recites the Qurʾān over the one who does not recite it among those who enter Paradise? She said: The number of levels in Paradise is equal to the number of verses of the Qurʾān, so none of those who enter Paradise is better than the one who recites the Qurʾān." And this Maʿfas was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim (4/1/433) with the narration of two others from him, and he did not mention any criticism or commendation about him, and Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Sudūsī was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim (3/2/324) with the narration of Wakīʿ from him and nothing more. He is unknown. And Wakīʿ - who is Ibn al-Jarrāḥ - is one of the teachers of Ibn Abī Shaybah from whom he frequently narrates, so it appears that his name was omitted from "Ibn Abī Shaybah" just as the name of his teacher appeared as (Maqʿas) with a qāf then ʿayn. This is a typographical error. In summary, the isnād of this tradition is weak. And Allāh knows best