I said: Farqad is considered weak in ḥadīth as previously mentioned, but if it is combined with what is not severely weak from the aforementioned ḥadīths, especially the mursal ḥadīth of Ibn Sābit with a sound isnād, then my opinion is that the ḥadīth collectively reaches the level of ṣaḥīḥ, particularly since it has corroboration from the ḥadīth of Abū Mālik al-Ashʿarī, which was previously referenced under numbers (90 and 91). As for the first part of it, it has been authenticated from the ḥadīth of ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmr, which I have recorded in "al-Rawḍ al-Nadīr" (1004), and it has other corroborations previously mentioned under number (1787).

"The night of the guest is a right upon every Muslim, so whoever wakes up with him in his courtyard, it is a debt upon him if he wishes to claim it or leave it." It was recorded by al-Bukhārī in "al-Adab al-Mufrad" (744), Abū Dāwūd (2/137), Ibn Mājah (2/392), al-Ṭaḥāwī in "al-Mushkil" (4/39), Aḥmad (4/130, 132, 133), Tamām (250/2), and Ibn ʿAsākir (17/77/2) through the route of Manṣūr from al-Shaʿbī from al-Miqdām Abū Karīmah al-Shāmī as marfūʿ. I said: Its isnād is ṣaḥīḥ, and its narrators are trustworthy. Ḥarīz followed it up from ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī ʿAwf al-Jarshī from al-Miqdām ibn Maʿdīkarib al-Kindī with a similar narration. It was recorded by Aḥmad (4/130-131). I said: Its isnād is also ṣaḥīḥ. There is another route with an additional anomalous part as I explained in "Takhrīj al-Mishkāt" (4247). It has a ṣaḥīḥ corroboration from the ḥadīth of ʿUqbah ibn ʿĀmir recorded in "al-Irwāʾ" (2591).