"the ḥadīth was recorded by Aḥmad and ʿAbd al-Razzāq with a sound chain in the wording of Muslim." However, the statement "in the wording of Muslim" is an error, for Muslim did not narrate it from ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Shibl at all, neither in this wording nor in any other. Rather, he narrated it from Abū Hurayrah in a similar manner without the phrase: "So whoever responds..."

"A man should pray in the mosque next to him and not follow [other] mosques." It was narrated by Tamām al-Rāzī (217/2) from Baqiyyah ibn al-Walīd, who reported from Mujāshiʿ ibn ʿAmr, who informed me from Manṣūr ibn Abī al-Aswad, from ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿUmar, from Nāfiʿ, from Ibn ʿUmar. I said: This isnād is disconnected, and its flaw is from Mujāshiʿ, about whom Ibn Maʿīn said: "One of the liars." Baqiyyah once concealed it, for Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ḥarbī narrated it in "A Part of His Ḥadīth" (39/1) from Baqiyyah from Manṣūr ibn Abī al-Aswad with it. So he omitted Mujāshiʿ from between him and Manṣūr, then used an ambiguous term. However, it was narrated through another route, as al-Ṭabarānī said (3/199/2): Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Naṣr al-Tirmidhī narrated to us, ʿUbādah ibn Ziyād al-Asadī informed us, Zuhayr ibn Muʿāwiyah narrated to us from ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿUmar with it. And with this isnād, it was recorded in "al-Awsaṭ" (22/2 of its arrangement) and he said: "No one narrated it from Zuhayr except ʿUbādah." I said: He is truthful, but Ibn Naṣr al-Tirmidhī is a reliable narrator who became severely confused. He has a biography in "al-Tārīkh" (1/365-366) and "al-Lisān," and al-Haythamī did not recognize him (2/24). In al-Ṭabarānī's words, there is an indication that he was not alone in narrating it, so the isnād is good. As for ʿAbd al-Ḥaqq's statement in "al-Aḥkām" (33/2): "I do not know anything said about Mujāshiʿ except that he is ṣāliḥ al-ḥadīth."