so I do not know how this occurred to him? For it is a pure error! Then I found another chain for it from Ibn ʿUmar, recorded by al-ʿUqaylī in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ" (348): Muḥammad ibn Zakariyyā al-Balkhī narrated to us, Qutaybah ibn Saʿīd narrated to us, Ḥabīb ibn Ghālib (as per the original) from al-ʿAwām ibn Ḥawshab from Ibrāhīm al-Taymī from Ibn ʿUmar with it. And he said: "al-Bukhārī said: Ghālib ibn Ḥabīb Abū Ghālib al-Yashkurī from al-ʿAwām ibn Ḥawshab, is munkar al-ḥadīth. I said: And likewise, al-Bukhārī mentioned him in "al-Tārīkh al-Ṣaghīr" (184), but it appeared in the chain of this ḥadīth and in another ḥadīth that al-ʿUqaylī traced from another shaykh of his from Qutaybah: "Ḥabīb ibn Ghālib" in reverse order. Al-ʿUqaylī said: "This is how al-Bukhārī translated it as 'Ghālib ibn Ḥabīb', and these two shaykhs narrated to us from Qutaybah - each one of them is a reliable narrator - and both said about him: 'Ḥabīb ibn Ghālib'. I do not think the error is from anyone but al-Bukhārī, and these two ḥadīths have been narrated with a different isnād from a source more reliable than this." Al-Dhahabī said: "He is unknown."

"There will be people from my nation who will recite the Quran, but they will exit from Islam as an arrow exits from the prey." It was recorded by Ibn Mājah (1/73), Aḥmad (1/256), his son also, and Abū Yaʿlá (2/623) from Abū al-Aḥwaṣ from Simāk from ʿIkrimah from Ibn ʿAbbās as marfūʿ. I said: And this isnād is good and it meets the criteria of Muslim. And the ḥadīth has many supporting narrations in "the two Ṣaḥīḥs" and others from a group of Companions, indeed