"there is no retaliation for a head wound, a deep wound, or a broken bone." It was recorded by Ibn Mājah (2/140-141) and Abū Yaʿlá (4/1580), and from him by al-Bayhaqī, from Rushdīn ibn Saʿd, from Muʿāwiyah ibn Ṣāliḥ, from Muʿādh ibn Muḥammad al-Anṣārī, from Ibn Aṣbahān, from him. I said: This isnād is weak. Ibn Aṣbahān, the ḥāfiẓ said: "His name is ʿUqbah, I think. If so, his narration is disconnected; otherwise, he is unknown." I said: His assertion of disconnection is questionable, for they mentioned his narration from ʿUthmān ibn ʿAffān, and his death was in the year thirty-five, while al-ʿAbbās died in the year two, or it is said three, or four and thirty. And Allāh knows best. And Muʿādh ibn Muḥammad al-Anṣārī was narrated from by a group of trustworthy narrators, and Ibn Ḥibbān deemed him reliable. And the ḥāfiẓ said: "Acceptable." And Rushdīn ibn Saʿd is weak. But he was followed by Ibn Lahīʿah from Muʿādh with it. It was narrated by Abū Yaʿlá. I said: Thus, the ḥadīth is ḥasan in my view, considering both chains. And Allāh knows best. Then Abū Yaʿlá (4/1581) narrated from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Wahb, who reported to us from Ibn Lahīʿah, from Muʿādh ibn Muḥammad al-Anṣārī, who said: ʿAmr ibn Maʿdī Karib informed me: "A man from Banī Kinānah received a head wound, and ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb wanted to retaliate against him, but al-ʿAbbās said to him: I heard the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) (and he mentioned), so he imposed the blood money." And this ʿAmr is two individuals, as in "al-Jarḥ" (3/1/260), and nothing was mentioned about them