ʿAbd Allāh as marfūʿ. Al-Ṭabarānī said: "No one narrated it from ʿĀṣim except Zayd, and no one from him except Yazīd." I said: He is Yazīd ibn Sinān ibn Yazīd al-Tamīmī, Abū Furwah al-Rahāwī, and he is weak. So the statement of al-Mundhirī in "al-Targhīb" (2/117), followed by al-Haythamī in "al-Majmaʿ" (3/221): "Narrated by Abū Yaʿlá and al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Awsaṭ' with a good isnād." I said: This is a clear leniency, or perhaps they thought that this Yazīd ibn Sinān is Yazīd ibn Sinān ibn Yazīd al-Qazzāz al-Baṣrī, Abū Khālid, resident of Egypt, for he is trustworthy, but he is not the narrator of the ḥadīth because he is later than al-Rahāwī. So be aware. It contradicts what al-Ṭabarānī also narrated (3/165/1) from Layth, from ʿAbd al-Malik, from Saʿīd, from Ibn ʿAbbās as marfūʿ with the wording: "Mūsá performed ḥajj on a red bull, wearing a Qatwānī cloak." Al-Mundhirī and al-Haythamī said: "In it is Layth ibn Abī Sulaym, and the rest of its narrators are trustworthy." Al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Nājī transmitted in his writing on "al-Targhīb" (Q 132/1) from al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Kathīr that he said: "It is very strange." I said: Its defect is that Layth was confused, and al-Haythamī's statement: "He is trustworthy but a mudallis." It is one of his delusions, for he is neither trustworthy nor a mudallis, but rather weak due to his confusion. The aspect of contradiction is his singling out the Qatwānī, contrary to the first ḥadīth. And perhaps al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Kathīr's strangeness of it is due to his mention of the bull, as it appears in "Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim" (1/105-106)