Mūsá al-Madīnī in "Muntahá Raghbāt al-Sāmiʿīn" (254/1) from various chains from ʿUthmān, from Rāshid ibn Saʿd, from Abū Ḥayy al-Muʾadhdhin, from Dhū Mukhbir, in a marfūʿ form, and al-Bukhārī and Aḥmad added: "and it will return to them." I say: Their isnād is good, its narrators are trustworthy except for Abū Ḥayy al-Muʾadhdhin, whose name is Shadād ibn Ḥayy. A group of trustworthy narrators reported from him, and al-ʿAjlī declared him reliable (496/1938), and Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him in (al-Kuná) among "the trustworthy followers," and this was not known to al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar as I clarified in "Taysīr al-Intifāʿ." Al-Ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Taqrīb": "Truthful." As for the ḥadīth, al-Haythamī said (5/162) after attributing it to Aḥmad and al-Ṭabarānī: "Their narrators are trustworthy." Al-Munāwī said afterward: "Hence the author symbolized it as ḥasan, but Ibn al-Jawzī said: This is a rejected ḥadīth, and Ismāʿīl ibn ʿAyyāsh, one of its narrators, was weakened, and Baqiyyah is a mudallis who narrates from the weak." And I say: There is no mention of Ismāʿīl and Baqiyyah in Aḥmad or others among those we mentioned as sources, so I do not know how this error occurred from Ibn al-Jawzī or al-Munāwī or the scribe of his book or its printer?!

"It is as if I see Mūsá (peace be upon him) in this valley, in a state of iḥrām, between two garments." It was narrated by Abū Yaʿlá (3/1262), al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr" (3/70/1) and "al-Awsaṭ" (1/119/1), Abū Bakr al-Muqriʾ al-Aṣbahānī in "al-Fawāʾid" (178/1), and Abū Nuʿaym in "al-Ḥilyah" (4/189) from Yazīd ibn Sinān, from Zayd ibn Abī Anīsah, from ʿĀṣim, from Zur, from