the second: his statement: "in the Farewell Pilgrimage," you have learned that it does not appear in any of the chains except the weak chain of Ibn ʿAsākir, and he attributed the ḥadīth with this addition to someone other than Ibn ʿAsākir as you have seen, and it is not with them, so it is a clear fabrication against them. the third: his statement: "and whoever reviews this ḥadīth in the Musnad of Aḥmad..." etc., is an obvious deception, for in the "Musnad" there is only the statement of Abū Isḥāq or someone below him regarding Ḥubshī: "and he had witnessed the Farewell Pilgrimage." And every person of intellect and knowledge knows that this sentence does not provide an explicit or implicit indication that Ḥubshī ibn Janādah heard the ḥadīth from him (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) during the Farewell Pilgrimage. the fourth: his statement: "in their two Ṣaḥīḥs" is another deception, for the books of al-Tirmidhī and al-Nasāʾī are known as "the Sunan" and not as "the Ṣaḥīḥ," especially since they contain weak ḥadīths that the author, let alone others, explicitly declares as weak, particularly the first of them. Moreover, al-Nasāʾī did not include the ḥadīth in his "Sunan" but rather in "al-Khaṣāʾiṣ" as previously mentioned, so this is another deception, even if he had also called it "the Ṣaḥīḥ" as is apparent! the fifth: his statement: "through multiple chains." This is also a lie because it does not have in the "Musnad" or elsewhere except one chain, which is the chain of Abū Isḥāq al-Sabīʿī from Ḥubshī. The chains only multiply to al-Sabīʿī alone, and in this case, it is not correct to say: "through multiple chains" except from someone lenient, or a deceiver like this Shīʿī. the sixth: his statement: "all of them are authentic." I say: this is a double lie because it only has one chain as previously explained. And because this chain cannot be declared authentic due to the confusion of the one who is unique in it - that is al-Sabīʿī, and due to his ambiguous transmission as previously explained. Then know that this Shīʿī has many lies in his mentioned book, in addition to his ignorance of this science and his reliance on weak and fabricated ḥadīths and his disparagement of the Companions and the Imams of ḥadīth