al-Aṣamm in "A Part of His Ḥadīth" (192/2 Majmūʿ 24) from Abū Isḥāq from Namīr ibn ʿArīb from ʿĀmir ibn Masʿūd as a marfūʿ ḥadīth. Likewise, it was narrated by al-Ḍiyāʾ al-Maqdisī in "al-Mukhtārah" (45-46) and in "al-Aḥādīth wa-al-Ḥikāyāt" (13/169/1), Ibn Abī Shaybah in "al-Muṣannaf" (2/181/2), al-Qaḍāʿī (13/1), and al-Bayhaqī in "al-Sunan" (4/496). I said: This isnād is weak; Namīr, according to al-Dhahabī, "is unknown." I said: It was also extracted by Ibn Abī al-Dunyā in "al-Tahajjud" (2/54/1): ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad informed us, saying: Asad informed us, saying: Isrāʾīl informed us from Abū Isḥāq from a Shaykh of Quraysh called ʿĀmir ibn Masʿūd as a marfūʿ ḥadīth, and he added: "As for his night, it is long, and as for his day, it is short." It was narrated by Ibn ʿAsākir (14/359/1) through another route from Isrāʾīl with it, and he said: "Thus it came in this narration, and Namīr ibn ʿArīb was omitted from its isnād between Abū Isḥāq and ʿĀmir." Then he traced it from the route of Aḥmad from Abū Isḥāq from Namīr from ʿĀmir with it. It has a supporting narration extracted by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Ṣaghīr" (p. 148, no. 69, al-Rawḍ) and Ibn ʿAdī (177/1) and Ibn ʿAsākir (2/111/1) from al-Walīd ibn Muslim from Saʿīd ibn Bashīr from Qatādah from Anas as a marfūʿ ḥadīth. The first two said: "No one narrated it from Qatādah except Saʿīd, and al-Walīd was alone in transmitting it." I said: He is trustworthy, but he practices tadlīs al-taswiyah, and he narrated his isnād with ʿanʿanah. Saʿīd ibn Bashīr is weak