"and it was narrated by Abū Nuʿaym from the ḥadīth of ʿĀʾishah with an isnād that is acceptable." I said: Its isnād should be examined, for al-Manāwī claimed that in "al-Mīzān": this is from the narration of Aṣram ibn Ḥawshab, who is not reliable, from Isḥāq ibn Wāṣil, who is ruined and his ḥadīth is abandoned. I said: I fear that al-Manāwī may have confused the ḥadīth of ʿAbd Allāh ibn Jaʿfar mentioned earlier with this ḥadīth of ʿĀʾishah, for I find it highly unlikely that these two abandoned narrators would be in its isnād and al-Ḥāfiẓ al-ʿIrāqī would say: it is acceptable! Then I was certain of what I had doubted when I saw that al-Dhahabī mentioned this in the biography of Isḥāq without naming the Companion of the ḥadīth, and al-Ḥāfiẓ mentioned in "al-Lisān" that it was ʿAbd Allāh ibn Jaʿfar, and that al-Ḥākim narrated it... So it became clear that al-Manāwī placed al-Dhahabī's words in the wrong context and that it is not right to criticize the ḥadīth of ʿĀʾishah with it. The ḥadīth has also been narrated with the wording: "There will be men from my ummah who eat various types of food, drink various types of drink, wear various types of clothing, and speak eloquently. They are the worst of my ummah." I said: It was recorded by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (no. 7512) and Tamām in "al-Fawāʾid" (264-265) from Jamīʿ ibn Thawb al-Raḥbī from Ḥabīb ibn ʿUbayd from Abū Umāmah as marfūʿ. I said: And this isnād is very weak. Jamīʿ, al-Bukhārī said: "His ḥadīth is denounced." And al-Nasāʾī said: "His ḥadīth is abandoned." But he was followed by Abū Bakr ibn Abī Maryam from Ḥabīb ibn ʿUbayd with it. It was also recorded by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Kabīr" (7513) and "al-Awsaṭ" (2536). And Abū Bakr ibn Abī Maryam is weak due to his confusion, so if it is combined with the earlier mursal narrations, it becomes..