It was recorded by Aḥmad (2/184): ʿAbd al-Ṣamad narrated to us from ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak, who narrated to us from Usāmah ibn Zayd, from ʿAmr ibn Shuʿayb, from his father, from ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmr that the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said: and he mentioned it. It was also recorded by al-Ṭayālisī (2264): Ibn al-Mubārak narrated it to us in the same way, except that he was uncertain and said: "or at their thresholds." It was recorded by al-Bayhaqī (4/110) through his route and he said: "Abū Dāwūd was uncertain." Muḥammad ibn al-Faḍl differed in his isnād and said: Ibn al-Mubārak narrated to us from Usāmah ibn Zayd, from his father, from Ibn ʿUmar with it elevated. It was recorded by Ibn Mājah (1806). I say: Muḥammad ibn al-Faḍl is al-Sadūsī, nicknamed "ʿĀrim," and he is trustworthy, but he became confused, so his contradiction to the two previous trustworthy narrators, ʿAbd al-Ṣamad, who is Ibn ʿAbd al-Wārith, and al-Ṭayālisī, is not considered. Their isnād is good, its men are trustworthy, and there is a difference of opinion regarding Usāmah ibn Zayd, who is Abū Zayd al-Laythī, and he is a reliable narrator. As for the statement of al-Būṣīrī in "al-Zawāʾid" (133/2): "And its isnād is weak due to the weakness of Usāmah." I say: Perhaps he intended Usāmah ibn Zayd al-ʿAdawī, for he is weak, and it is more likely what we mentioned that it is al-Laythī, for he is the one mentioned among the narrators from ʿAmr ibn Shuʿayb, not al-ʿAdawī. Both of them are among the teachers of Ibn al-Mubārak. And Allāh knows best. There is a supporting ḥadīth narrated by ʿAbd al-Malik ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAmr ibn Ḥazm from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Abī Bakr from ʿAmr from ʿĀʾishah with a similar elevation. It was recorded by al-Bayhaqī. And this ʿAbd al-Malik, I did not know him.